LCA threshold
Unblock an exceeded LCA threshold (collective housing)
ARKEMEP optimises the life cycle assessment before filing to bring the carbon indicator back below the RE2020 threshold. This is a design engineering assignment.
Getting back below the carbon threshold before filing
When the Ic_construction indicator of a collective-housing project exceeds the RE2020 threshold, the permit filing is at risk. The lever is upstream: material and construction-method choices, per-package LCA calculation, design trade-offs. ARKEMEP conducts this optimisation as an engineering firm, before the file is blocked.
It is a design engineering assignment, not coupled to any certification. The earlier it starts in the programme, the more room there is to bring the indicator below the threshold without inflating the operation.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
The situation
The threshold is missed, the permit is filed, the clock is running.
The most frequent version of this problem: a collective housing scheme reaches the carbon calculation late, exceeds the applicable threshold, and the structural design is already fixed. At that point the obvious answers, change the structure, change the envelope, are the expensive ones, and they restart the design.
The less obvious answers are usually available and are found in the calculation rather than in the building. Environmental product declarations for the actual products specified, rather than default values, frequently move the result by more than a material substitution would.
Method
Interrogate the model before rebuilding the project.
A carbon model built on default data is deliberately conservative: the regulation penalises the absence of information. Replacing defaults with manufacturer-specific declarations, verifying quantities against the actual bill of materials, and checking the allocation of shared elements typically recovers a meaningful margin, without changing a single design decision.
Where that is not enough, targeted substitutions ranked by carbon-per-euro give the project a shortlist rather than a redesign. The point is to know which lever is worth pulling, which requires the model to be interrogated first.
Going further
Related pages.
This question connects to these pages.
- Life-cycle carbon assessment — the calculation itself
- RE2020 in the tertiary sector — the regulatory frame
- ARKEMEP: thermal and carbon engineering — who runs the model
- Certifying biodiversity on a development — the adjacent question
- Working with property developers — the wider engagement
- Working with architects — where the structural decision is taken
- Engineering partner for competitions — modelling before the design freezes
- LCA on estate renovation — the same question on existing stock
- RE2020 for offices — the same calculation on another typology
- Engineering — how the model is built
- Measurements and diagnostics — verifying the delivered result
- Securing the permit against ecological challenge — the adjacent risk
- Managed residences — a frequent product type
Optimise a blocked LCA
ARKEMEP, LCA and thermal engineering under one roof.
Sans engagement · Réponse sous 48 h ouvrées · Données confidentielles